The Albany Times-Union published a letter to the editor from Jack Lauber, a former New York State air regulator, which Lauber discusses the benefits of using waste-to-energy as a trash management tool and why concerns over emissions are a thing of the past.  Lauber states that, "Modern WTE technologies involve enhanced waste recycling and separation, high-efficiency combustion and advanced air pollution controls including dry scrubbing."  Noting that the European Union relies on a combination of recycling and waste-to-energy, Lauber laments New York City's reliance on landfilling as their primary waste management tool.

The Energy Recovery Council testified at a hearing this week before the Maryland Senate Committee on Education, Health and Environmental Affairs in opposition to two bills that would have severely restricted the ability to construct waste-to-energy facilities in Maryland. ERC testimony this week complemented written testimony submitted last month on a third bill that would have also placed arbitrary limitations on the siting of waste-to-energy plants in the state. The Committee took swift and decisive action following the hearing and voted down all three bills. All three bills were similar in nature: they would have prohibited the Maryland Department of the Environment from permitting construction of a waste-to-energy facility based on proximity to homes, parks, schools, hospitals, nursing homes, churches, etc.  ERC believes that these bills are heavy-handed reactions to garden variety not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) issues and would inappropriately limit the ability of local governments to make informed and considered judgments on the siting of waste-to-energy plants.

The Union County Utilities Authority (UCUA) has been recently honored with a Silver MERCURY Award in the Public Awareness Video Category for its educational video: “It’s Not Waste if it’s energy”. Established in 1987 with the principal purpose of advancing the arts and sciences of communications in an international arena, the MERCURY Awards exist to recognize and reward excellence, imagination and innovation. Winners were chosen from 290+ categories and classifications, honoring creativity, determination, functionality, originality, and smart thinking. The UCUA’s winning video, “It’s Not Waste if it’s Energy” details the process and benefits of converting municipal solid waste into clean, cost-saving, renewable energy for the residents of Union County, New Jersey. The video is currently featured on the UCUA Web site at www.ucua.org.

The South Florida Sun-Sentinel ran an editorial today that supports the Solid Waste Authority's decision to build a an additional waste-to-energy facility in Palm Beach County to delay the closure of the county landfill.  In 2006, the average county resident threw away 9.5 pounds of garbage every day — a full 30 percent more than 10 years before. The county has decided to solicit proposals from private companies to build and operate a new $700 million waste-to-energy plant.  The Sun-Sentinel editorial stated that "squeezing energy out of garbage puts trash to good use. That's not just green. It's smart. And it's the best plan the county has in the works for dealing with its growing trash pile."

The Energy Recovery Council testified this week in Boston on a bill to implement a ballot question that would strip renewable energy credits from biomass and waste-to-energy plants. The Massachusetts Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy took testimony on a proposal to strip biomass and waste-to-energy plants of renewable incentives if they emit more than 250 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour. Testifying in strong opposition to the proposal, Ted Michaels of the Energy Recovery Council urged the Committee to use a life cycle analysis when looking at greenhouse gases and not rely on arbitrary limits. In addition, Michaels urged the committee to continue to model its renewable policies based on progressive European nations that recognize that waste-to-energy as a renewable energy source and a net reducer of greenhouse gases.  Also testifying against the legislation were developers of renewable energy and major nongovernmental organizations such as the Union of Concerned Scientists, Environmental Defense, and Environment America.